|
Post by Marge Smith on Dec 28, 2002 11:20:42 GMT -5
I discovered a new research source. GIS.
Those of you who have been to Elizabeth and the Apple River Fort know how convoluted this area is, nothing is on north-south, east-west lines.
I knew where the gap was that the Indians surprised the expressmen before the attack at ARF. You can drive into it from Route 20, but you can't see the fort for all the trees. Once you are in the gap only a right turn is possible to a farmer's buildings, away from the fort.
You can drive thru a fairly new sub-division and see the fort, but you don't know where the gap is from there. I went to county offices and got soil maps, old maps when the railroad was still there, anything to better visualize the fort/gap location. But I still could not picture it.
Then, at the courthouse was a office called "GIS". From a satellite photo I can now see the fort, where the gap is in relation to the fort and how the fort sits in relation to the town. Isn't technology grand.
I don't know if GIS will solve other mysteries, you should have section, township, range. I think it cost me $2 or $3 for the copy.
Marge
|
|
|
Post by Robert Braun on Mar 25, 2003 10:04:44 GMT -5
This is very interesting.
How do we know that the expressmen were suprised at a "gap?" Did the old "Kellogg Trail" cross Terrapin Ridge at a gap or other similar terrain feature?
Thanks... Bob.
|
|
|
Post by Marge Smith on Mar 30, 2003 11:07:18 GMT -5
The narratives that come down to us about the battle at Apple River Fort tells of the expressmen stopping at the fort and then continuing onward. They were surprised at "the gap" by the Indians. One man was wounded, they returned to the fort which was followed by Black Hawk's attack.
The gap is a level place between two hills. As you exit Elizabeth going east is the first hill. Then you come to the "gap", and then the second hill is called Flintlocks Hill. Then you go to a higher elevation called Terrapin Ridge which is a fairly narrow ridge with valleys on both sides.
I do not know where the Kellogg's Trail was in 1832, in 1839 at the first government survey it follows Elizabeth's Main Street. There is a road called Bethel Road which angles off from the east end of Terrapin Ridge section of Route 20. We know that Bethel Road was part of the Trail. And we know where the Trail crossed Apple River at Georgetown on the west of Elizabeth.
Whether Kellogg's Trail went past the Soulard Smelting Establishment (the fort) in 1832 is still a mystery. It seems logical the Trail would have been close to haul the big loads of lead to Galena. But so far there is no proof.
Elizabeth was platted later and the road could have been moved to accomodate the new town.
Marge
|
|
|
Post by Robert Braun on May 30, 2003 15:19:15 GMT -5
Marge... hello.
A few items here.
My search of the available literature centers on "Bushy" Bill Johnson's account as the source that puts the expressmen in the "gap" you mentioned. Others mention a distance of some 300 yards from the fort as the place where the expressmen met the elements of Black Hawk's force.
Stevens, pp. 185-6, wrote:
Steven's source may well have been John Flack, whose letter was recounted in Wakfield, pp. 66-7:
Since we know these expressmen were carrying dispatches for General Atkinson, they surely were using Kellogg's Trail to get them to Dixon, IL. It would seem to me that a knowledge of the track of Kellogg Trail, coupled with Flack's mention of "three hundred yards", plus your map information, might indeed provide cooberative evidence for a location of the site of the expressmen's encounter with Black Hawk's war-party.
One final query. You frequenty describe Apple River Fort as a smelting establishment. To me, this says that you feel that a furnace was located directly on the fort site. While there is no doubt that settlements and lead digging was done in the immediate vicinity of the fort site, the archaeology done on the site clearly indicated findings inconsistant with a log furnace smelting operation.
Further, any local trees used for the fort pickets would have been long consumed by the smelting operation. (This was a problem locals encountered in constructing Fort Jackson at Mineral Point.) Would you agree?
If you are going off of plat maps or other land surveys, we would still need to square the evidence on the ground with the maps... and Flacks mention.
|
|
|
Post by Marge Smith on May 31, 2003 10:05:00 GMT -5
Bob Braun--
I don't know where the Kellogg Trail was in 1832. By the time Elizabeth is formed the road goes thru the center of that town.
I don't know what inconsistent findings in the archaeology report you have reference to. There was no search for a log furnace site, only for the fort on the top of the hill. Log furnaces were built into the side of a hill.
I can't answer about the quantity of wood that would have been available except to say that Henry Soulard, the owner of the smelting establishment, had just increased his acreage to 720 acres before the war.
I think you should address Susan Gordy not me. She is the director of the Apple River Fort and her research has led her construct a farm- type site. I bow to her historical expertise.
Marge Smith
|
|
|
Post by Robert Braun on Jun 2, 2003 6:43:13 GMT -5
Marge, a couple of points/queries--
1. IMHO, the Kellogg Trail piece would be an important part of the puzzle. The information you have gleaned regarding the gap, plus Flack's "three hundred yards" distance-- all coupled with a discernment as to the track of the Kellogg Trail would perhaps confirm the scene of the initial encounter between the expressmen and Black Hawk's war-party;
2. My question regarding your comment in this and other threads:
was, upon reflection, maybe too specific.
Would I be correct in observing that your usage of "Soulyard Smelting Establishment" in conjunction with "the fort" meant that, within Soulyard's 720 acres lay the location of the original fort? (Meaning, in the same way that "Fort Winnebago" meant the land ecompassing a U. S. military reservation, and included the specific military buildings complex?)
Kind regards, Bob.
|
|
|
Post by Marge Smith on Jun 3, 2003 9:02:02 GMT -5
The gap that exists onto Route 20 east of Elizabeth is more than 300 yards from the Apple River Fort site. But in 1832 I don't know how long the "gap" was.
The first plat for Henry Soulard shows an unusual southern boundary configuration which still appears today on the property purchased for the fort site. It shows a road entering from the west going to a black box (log furnace?) and two houses. Since this land had not been surveyed yet, the plat is described in metes and bounds. I guess you could argue that this smelting establishment could have been anywhere which I cannot defend with any hard evidence at this time.
Marge Smith
|
|
|
Post by Robert Braun on Jun 3, 2003 13:00:46 GMT -5
Alright... I agree that it makes sense that BH's war-party probably came from the east towards Apple River Fort, and most probably crossed Terrapin Ridge.
And I stipulate that Flack's "300 yards" distance may well be an estimate on his part.
Examination of the Chandler map reveals what is probably the Kellogg Trail, running a generally east-west track. The map is by no means conclusive, but it seems to support your indication that modern Route 20 may well follow the old trail.
Given our admitted lack of knowledge on the track of the Kellogg Trail, and a distance from Apple River Fort far in excess of Flack's recollection, how were you able to determine that the gap seen in your GIS analysis is the gap mentioned by Johnson?
Regards, Bob.
|
|
|
Post by Marge Smith on Jun 4, 2003 17:46:13 GMT -5
Bob,
I asked older people in the area where the "gap" was.
I know Susan Gordy placed the "gap" ontop of Terrapin Ridge in an article that she wrote. I don't know what her evidence was, but that would have been even further from the fort.
Soon. I hope to continue reading the Elizabeth news in the Galena newspapers. Somethings there is a jewel buried using placenames.
One interesting tidbit buried in Bushy Bill's account. He locates where the Indians spent the night after the attack as being on someone's farm (I've forgotten the name). If you trace that property it is the valley on the south side of Route 20 across from the "gap".
But in other accounts you get the feeling the Indians went north to someone's house on Apple River. That Frederick Dixon surprised them there and he (Dixon) took off running to Galena.
I don't know what to say. One account says they lowered Route 20 in 1915 when they put in the old Route 5. And they certainly changed the landscape in the area around the gap about 15 years ago.
I still say contact Susan Gordy with your "gap" question. She is the professional historian. I don't know what research she has done on the Kellogg's Trail.
Marge Smith
|
|
|
Post by Robert Braun on Jun 5, 2003 8:51:30 GMT -5
William Johnson wrote:
Apparently Welsh or Welch had gotten into the sippin' whiskey during the mid-day meal, and was bragging that he "could alone lick all the Indians in America."
Regarding your mention of the campsite of Black Hawk's war-party, post-Apple River Fort, Johnson recorded:
Where did you say this farm was located?
|
|
|
Post by Marge Smith on Jun 5, 2003 21:52:37 GMT -5
Bob-
What does Susan Gordy say about the Kellogg Trail?
You were right in the first place to chase that trail down. That is your primary source and would answer many questions.
All of these narratives about the battle at the Apple River Fort only agree on two things - there was a battle and there was a fort. They are only secondary sources.
Marge Smith
|
|
|
Post by Robert Braun on Jun 5, 2003 22:52:12 GMT -5
Marge...
The two sources cited herein... Flack and Johnson... were eyewitnesses to the events at Apple River Fort. That makes them primary sources, according to the UCLA Institute on Primary Resources' definition:
"Primary resources provide firsthand evidence of historical events. They are generally unpublished materials such as manuscripts, photographs, maps, artifacts, audio and video recordings, oral histories, postcards, and posters. In some instances, published materials can also be viewed as primary materials for the period in which they were written. In contrast, secondary materials, such as textbooks, synthesize and interpret primary materials."
Marge, you began this thread with the statement:
Rcently, you seem to be wanting to drag Susan's research into the equation... which is frankly neither here nor there. You indicated you knew the location of the encounter between the expressmen and the Sauk war-party. I am only trying to understand your findings.
Bob.
|
|